Editorial Policy

Published work should identify material sources and distinguish sourced facts, analytical interpretation, and hypothetical scenarios. Dates, figures, and attributed claims should be checked against the source available to the author or editor at publication.

Tools may assist with drafting, summarization, formatting, analysis, or visual production. Tool output is not evidence by itself. The identified author or editor remains responsible for material selected for publication and should not present unsupported generated claims as verified facts.

Sponsorship, affiliate, or other commercial relationships should be disclosed where relevant and remain separate from editorial conclusions. They do not determine Free Lite intelligence, VIP Deep intelligence, analytical outputs, or the five-product launch scope.

Images are illustrative unless their context identifies them as documentary source material. Captions, alternative text, and metadata should not invent provenance or describe an image more specifically than the available source supports.

Readers can report a possible error through Contact. A confirmed correction should preserve the distinction between the original source, editorial interpretation, and revised material.

Publication reflects responsibility for the material actually released. This policy does not claim that every item receives a named reviewer, a fixed multi-stage review, or a universal imagery audit.